Overview
Address:
2210 Robinson Street
Conway, AR 72034
County/Parish:
Faulkner
Website:
www.dardanelleregional.org/locations/all-locations/conway-regional-rehabilitation-hospital
Phone Number:
(501) 932-3500
Ownership Type:For profit
CMS Region: 6
CMS Certification Number:043033
Medicare Certification Date: 12/17/2004
Inpatient Rehab Facilities Nearby | ||
---|---|---|
Provider Name | City | Ownership Type |
Baptist Health Medical Center-Conway | Conway | Non-profit |
Conway Medical Center | Conway | Non-profit |
Search for affiliated doctors and clinicians
Affiliated Doctors and Clinicians | |||
---|---|---|---|
Full Name | Credential | Primary Specialty | Group Affiliation |
Roy E Denton | Internal Medicine |
Conditions Treated
This metric indicates the frequency of Medicare beneficiaries with specific medical conditions, such as spinal cord injuries, receiving treatment at specialized inpatient rehabiliation facilities within the past year.
Conditions treated in the last year | Number of times treated |
---|---|
All other conditions | 145 |
Brain disease or condition (non-traumatic) | 14 |
Brain injury (traumatic) | Less than 11 |
Hip or femur fracture | 39 |
Hip or knee replacement, amputation or other bone or joint condition | 32 |
Nervous system disorder (excluding stroke) | 21 |
Spinal cord disease or condition (non-traumatic) | Less than 11 |
Spinal cord injury (traumatic) | Less than 11 |
Stroke | 42 |
Quality
Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Scores by Category
Complications
An illness or complication contracted during a stay in an Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF), referred to as a healthcare-acquired condition (HAC), is electronically reported by each facility to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) through the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Patient Assessment Instrument (IRF-PAI).
Percentage of patients with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened Lower percentages are better | 1.9% National average: 1.1% |
Percentage of IRF patients who experience one or more falls with major injury during their IRF stay Lower percentages are better | 0.0% National average: 0.2% |
Results of Care
Each Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) electronically submits data on patients' functional abilities at admission and discharge, an essential practice for enhancing the quality of care for IRF patients through outcome measurement.
Change in patients' ability to care for themselves Higher scores are better | 15.1 National average: 13.4 |
Change in patients' ability to move around Higher scores are better | 28.7 National average: 32.5 |
Effective Care
Enhancing functional abilities stands as a crucial objective for Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) patients, with each facility electronically transmitting data regarding patients' functional abilities and goals.
Percentage of patients whose functional abilities were assessed and functional goals were included in their treatment plan Higher percentages are better | 100.0% National average: 99.9% |
Percentage of patients who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge Higher percentages are better | 82.3% National average: 62.3% |
Percentage of patients who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge Higher percentages are better | 47.7% National average: 61.3% |
Medication Reconciliation
Each facility electronically submits data on medication reconciliation practices, aiming to mitigate medication-related errors and their potential impact on patients' quality of life and complications.
Percentage of patients whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified Higher percentages are better | 92.7% National average: 97.6% |
Infections
Healthcare-associated infection measures offer insight into infections contracted during a patient's stay in an IRF, providing information on infection control practices for safety, which are developed by the CDC and reported by IRFs through the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) using a standardized infection ratio (SIR) comparing facility infection rates to national benchmarks, with lower numbers indicating better performance.
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) Lower numbers are better | Not Available Not Available National benchmark: 1.000 National average: 1.032 |
Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) Lower numbers are better | 1.410 No Different than the National Benchmark National benchmark: 1.000 National average: 0.462 |
Prevention
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) developed healthcare worker vaccination measures to demonstrate vaccination rates among healthcare workers as appropriate.
Percentage of healthcare personnel who got a flu shot for the current season Higher percentages are better | 86.2% National average: 78.2% |
Percentage of IRF healthcare personnel who completed COVID-19 primary vaccination series Higher percentages are better | 91.7% National average: 88.8% |
Readmissions
Readmission rates indicate the percentage of IRF patients who experienced hospitalization for potentially preventable conditions, with assessment conducted through two measures: readmissions occurring during the patient's stay and those within 30 days post-discharge from the IRF.
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from an IRF Lower percentages are better | 8.64% No Different than the National Rate National average: 8.65% |
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions during the IRF stay Lower percentages are better | 5.89% No Different than the National Rate National average: 4.89% |
Successful Return to Home or Community
Discharge to community rates, derived from Medicare enrollment and claims data, reflect the percentage of IRF patients successfully returning home or to the community and remaining alive without unplanned hospitalizations within 31 days post-discharge, a significant goal for both patients and their families.
Rate of successful return to home or community from an IRF Higher rates indicate an overall higher likelihood of discharge to community | 67.37% No Different than the National Rate National average: 66.93% |
Payment and Value of Care
This measure assesses whether Medicare expenditure for an episode of care provided to a Medicare patient in a specific IRF exceeds, falls below, or aligns with the national average expenditure across all IRFs, calculated by dividing the total Medicare Part A and Part B payments made for services during the episode of care by the median expenditure nationally, with data sourced from Medicare enrollment and claims data, where a ratio equivalent to the national average indicates similar expenditure, a higher ratio signifies greater expenditure, and a lower ratio indicates lesser expenditure compared to the national average.
Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for patients in IRFs | 0.98 National average: 1.00 |